C. Atkinson, R. R. Q&a, and D. P. Mayer, The cognitive load of PowerPoint The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material, Récupéré le 17 avril 2006 du site de Sociable Media, pp.267-272, 1960.

R. A. Bartsch and K. M. Et-cobern, Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures, Computers & Education, vol.41, issue.1, pp.77-86, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00027-7

J. S. Basque and J. Et-ullman, Une réflexion sur les fonctions attribuées aux TIC en enseignement universitaire Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire, pp.30-42, 2004.
DOI : 10.18162/ritpu.2005.66

URL : http://doi.org/10.18162/ritpu.2005.66

T. Center and L. Services, Active learning with PowerPoint Evaluating student PowerPoint presentations -A series of online guides and rubrics compiled by the Teaching Resource Center. Récupéré le 17 avril, asp Columbia Accident Investigation Board Report, p.762, 2003.

D. Diaz, The Pedagogy of Multimedia Presentation

N. R. Dvoracek, Basics workshop on the effective use of PowerPoint Récupéré le 17 avril 2006 du site de l' auteur, section Using PowerPoint, http://idea. uwosh.edu/nick/usingppt.htm Éducnet (n.d.) Projet Competice Assessing multimedia presentations: A PowerPoint rubric The Art of Readable Writing, 1974.

E. Gallagher, M. Et-reder, /. Volume16, P. S. Goodyear, and . Banks, PowerPoint: Possibilities and problems Essays on Teaching Excellence: Toward the Best in the Academy Récupéré le 25 avril 2006 du site http Towards a pattern language for networked learning Lancaster University, UK. Récupéré le 17 avril 2006 du site de la conférence Students' perception of computer-aided lectures in two high school classrooms Powerpoint in the classroom: Where is the power?, Proceedings of Networked LearningProceedings/ ProceedingsNL2004.pdf Hill, pp.453-459, 1998.

D. D. Howell, D. K. Howell, J. Morrow, A. Seguin, and J. B. Et-summerville, Using PowerPoint in the classroom, 2002.

K. Kunkel, Presentation Software : Does the course make a difference. The Teaching Professor, 2004.

J. Lanar and D. Et-rigaud, PowerPoint et pédagogie, quelles conditions? Présentation effectuée au XXII e congrès de l' Association, pp.12-14, 2005.

D. Leclercq and L. L. Lohr, Pour une pédagogie universitaire de qualité Liège : Mardaga. Les professeurs d'université sont branchés? à la maison et dans la salle de cours Bulletin Formation et Profession Designing the instructional interface, Computers in Human Behaviour, pp.161-182, 1998.

T. Ludwig, D. David, R. Froman, V. Et-mathie, and E. J. Mantei, Using Multimedia In Classroom Presentations: Best Principles Récupéré le 25 avril 2006 du site de la Society for the Teaching of Psychology Using Internet class notes and PowerPoint in the physical geology lecture, Journal of College Science Teaching, vol.29, issue.5, pp.301-305, 2000.

P. Marek, A. N. Christopher, and C. S. Et-koenig, Applying Technology to Facilitate Poster Presentations, Teaching of Psychology, vol.23, issue.4, pp.70-72, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/0166-2236(89)90039-8

P. M. Marr, Grouping Students at the Computer to Enhance the Study of British Literature, The English Journal, vol.90, issue.2, pp.120-125, 2000.
DOI : 10.2307/821228

R. E. Mayer and R. B. Et-anderson, The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning., Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.84, issue.4, pp.444-452, 1992.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.444

R. E. Mayer and J. K. Et-gallini, When is an illustration worth ten thousand words?, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.82, issue.4, pp.715-726, 1990.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.715

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.462.2856

J. G. Mckenzie, Scoring power points. From Now On -The Educational Technology Journal Récupéré le 17 avril 2006 du site de la revue The magical number seven, plus or minus two, Psychological Review, vol.10, issue.63, pp.81-97, 1956.

J. Morkes and J. Et-nielsen, Concise, scannable, and objective: How to write for the Web, 1997.

G. Nault and G. D. Et-therriault, Guide pour l'élaboration d'une présentation PowerPoint Récupéré le 17 avril 2006 du site du Doctorat réseau en éducation de l'Université du Québec, section Ressources What annoys audiences about PowerPoint presentations? Récupéré le 17 avril Absolute Powerpoint. Can a software package edit our thoughts?, 2001.

R. S. Pastore, H. E. Pence, R. Phipps, and J. Et-merisotis, Multimedia project evaluation rubric Récupéré le 17 avril 2006 du site de l'auteur, section Multimedia Resources, http:// teacherworld.com/multimediarubric PowerPoint and cooperative learning: An ideal instructional communication. The Technology Source What's the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education, The Institute For Higher Education Policy, 1997.

Z. K. Quible, Maximizing the Effectiveness of Electronic Presentations, Business Communication Quarterly, vol.65, issue.2, pp.82-85, 2002.
DOI : 10.1177/108056990206500207

L. J. Robertson, Twelve tips for using a computerised interactive audience response system, Medical Teacher, vol.22, issue.3, pp.237-239, 2000.
DOI : 10.1080/01421590050006179

L. Teaching, . Technology, L. Tlt-]-group, and M. Et-balmert, Getting feedback on your uses of PowerPoint and other presentation software Creating an interactive Powerpoint lesson for the classroom, Récupéré le 17 avril 2006 du site du TLT Group, 2000.

E. Tufte and E. J. Tufte, The cognitive style of PowerPoint septembre) PowerPoint is evil. Wired A+ PowerPoint rubric Effective use of PowerPoint. Pointers and Clickers, ION's Technology Tip of the Month, Récupéré le 17 avril 2006 du site du magazine Récupéré le 17 avril 2006 du site de la University of Wisconsin ? Stout, School of Education, section Online Professional Development ? Rubrics, 2003.

R. J. Vetter, C. R. Ward, and S. Shapiro, Using color and text in multimedia projections, IEEE Multimedia, vol.2, issue.4, pp.46-54, 1995.
DOI : 10.1109/93.482295

S. Villeneuve, Les logiciels de présentation en pédagogie Effi cacité de l'utilisation des logiciels de présentation en pédagogie universitaire. Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire, pp.49-53, 2004.
DOI : 10.18162/ritpu.2004.34

URL : http://doi.org/10.18162/ritpu.2004.34