. S. Aouag, Specification of a multilevel model for an individualized didactic planning: case of learning to read, Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2005, pp.1531-1537, 2005.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/edutice-00435209

W. B. Barbe, R. H. Swassing, . Milone, and N. Michael, Teaching through modality strengths : concepts and practices, 1979.

P. Brusilovsky and L. Pesin, ISiS-Tutor: An adaptive hypertext learning environment, Proceedings of JCKBSE'94, Japanese-CIS Symposium on knowledge-based software engineering, 1994.

M. Chambreuil and P. Bussapapach, Analysis of a didactic situation as a complex multifacetted object for individualizing a computer-based learning, MEDIA 2001 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, 2001.

C. Cherkaoui, Aspects de la planification didactique : étude dans le cadre d'un environnement d'aide à l'apprentissage de la lecture, C. Cherkaoui, M. Chambreuil & L. Gaguet, Sciences et Techniques Educatives, vol.4, issue.3, pp.257-297, 1997.

C. Cleder, Planification didactique et construction de l'objectif d'une session de travail individualisée : modélisation des connaissances et du raisonnement mis en jeu, p.250, 2002.

D. Soldato, T. Boulay, and B. , Implementation of motivational tactics in tutoring systems, Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol.6, issue.4, pp.337-378, 1995.

R. Dunn, . Dunn, . Kenneth, . Price, and E. Garry, Identifying individual learning styles Student learning styles : diagnosing and prescribing programs, National Asssociation of Secondary School Principals, pp.39-54, 1979.

A. K. Fathman, M. E. Quinn, and C. Kessler, Teaching science to English learners, grades 4?8, NCBE Program Information Guide Series, vol.11, pp.1-25, 1992.

G. Fischer, User Modeling in Human-Computer Interaction, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol.11, issue.1/2, pp.65-86, 2001.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1011145532042

M. Gonschorek and C. Herzog, Using hypertext for an adaptive helpsystem in an intelligent tutoring system. AI-ED'95, 7th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp.274-281, 1995.

R. Koper, Modeling units of study from a pedagogical perspective -The pedagogical metamodel behind EML http, 2001.

S. Kota and A. C. Ward, Functions, structures and constraints in conceptual design, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, pp.27239-250, 1991.

M. R. Lepper, M. Woolverton, D. L. Mumme, and J. Gurtner, Motivational techniques of expert human tutors: Lessons for the design of computer-based tutors, Computers as Cognitive Tools, pp.75-105, 1993.

J. Martin and K. Vanlehn, Discrete factor analysis: Learning hidden variables in Bayesian networks, 1995.

. Merrill, Knowledge objects and mental models The Instructional Use of Learning Objects, 2000.

D. N. Nunney and J. E. Hill, Personalized educational programs, Audio-Visual Instruction, pp.10-15, 1972.

J. Pernin and A. Lejeune, Scénarios d'apprentissage : quelles stratégies de réutilisation pour les enseignants, colloque TICE Méditérranée, 2004.

R. C. Murray, K. Vanlehn, and J. Mostow, Looking Ahead to Select Tutorial Actions: A Decision-Theoretic Approach, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2004.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00197308

D. A. Wiley, Connecting Learning Objects to Instructional Design Theory: A Definition, a Metaphor, and a Taxonomy, The Instructional Use of Learning Objects. Agency for Instructional Technology and Association for Educational Communications & Technology, 2002.